| | Checkers - Discussion about Checkers.
| Opening Name Posted by Robyn Hode on 24 May 2013 at 10:58AMIs there a name for this variation of the Cross Opening?
11-15 23-18 8-11 27-23 9-13? Red usually plays 4-8, 9-14 or 10-14.
|
| | Re: Opening Name Posted by Lind on 24 May 2013 at 11:31AMI do not think the 9-13 line has any particular name. It is a good move and one I have used in major championships to win with, the last occasion beating Terry Thomas (former Welsh Open Champion) at the Mind Sports Olympics. So, not a bad line
|
| | Re: Opening Name Posted by Robyn Hode on 24 May 2013 at 11:58AMThank you Lind. I hadn't seen it before. I expected 4-8 and was going to play 23-19, but with 9-13 there isn't the hole on 8 so Red can play 11-16 and after exchanges I didn't like the look of White's position after 31-26 to get the checker back since after 23-27 32-23, 4-8! looks bad for White.
|
| | Re: Opening Name Posted by Robyn Hode on 24 May 2013 at 12:07PMCorrection: hole on 11 after 11-16...(D-line).
|
| | Re: Opening Name Posted by Robyn Hode on 24 May 2013 at 12:24PMProbably confused people with my last two posts.
Here is the line I was commenting on:
11-15 23-18 8-11 27-23 9-13 (instead of 4-8) 23-19? 11-16! (Of course Red cannot play 11-16 if he had played 4-8 because of 18-4) 18-11 16-23 26-19 7-23 31-26 23-27! 32-23 4-8! does not look good for White.
If Lind says 9-13 is a good move then I want to try it!
|
| | Re: Opening Name Posted by Lind on 24 May 2013 at 1:14PMSome nice play on it in Lees' Guide. I think it is by Swan and Adamson but I might have the names wrong as I have not looked at Lees' Guide for about 30 years.
|
| | Re: Opening Name Posted by dama1 on 24 May 2013 at 1:37PM9-13. is to draw fast... I will move 10-14 its hard for red. but. if white is not a pro player. he lose the game...
|
| | Re: Opening Name Posted by Robyn Hode on 24 May 2013 at 1:41PMUh oh...
I played 18-14 and after 10-17 21-14 he played 4-8 and it is my move. Pray for me.
|
| | Re: Opening Name Posted by Lind on 24 May 2013 at 1:44PMlol
|
| | Re: Opening Name Posted by Robyn Hode on 25 May 2013 at 11:50AMThank you again Lind for the reference to Lees' Guide Online.
I have found one game with the preceding moves mentioned above...
[Event "Lees' Guide p.35u, Swan/Adamson"]
[Black ""]
[White ""]
[Date ""]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
11-15 23-18 8-11 27-23 9-13 18-14 10-17 21-14 4-8 23-18 12-16 24-20 8-12 28-24 6-10 25-21 10-17 21-14 2-6 32-28 6-10 29-25 10-17 25-21 1-6 21-14 6-10 30-25 10-17 25-21 7-10 21-7 3-10 18-14 10-17 26-23 1/2-1/2
I'm following this move order in my game (with analysis as to why the moves were made).
Downloadable versions of the book here: http://archive.org/details/completeguidetog00lees
|
| | Re: Opening Name Posted by Lind on 25 May 2013 at 11:56AMHi Robyn,
Thank you so much. Yes, that is the play I was thinking about. The fact that I could remember it was Swan and Adamson proves that I am not going senile quite yet, lol. There is some other play on this line shown in the 19th American Championship book. Again, I have not looked at this book for many years so could be wrong. I do know that there are some lovely lines of play off the 9-13 route.
Best wishes,
Lindus.
|
| The Move Posted by Robyn Hode on 21 May 2013 at 11:10AMHow do you find out who has The Move, or First Move (the opposition in chess)?
|
| | Re: The Move Posted by dama1 on 21 May 2013 at 12:19PMyou put the pawn in your hand, and let the player guess. if got the pawn. he or she first..
|
| | Re: The Move Posted by Robyn Hode on 21 May 2013 at 12:46PMThat's different from what I learned.  When it's my move I count the number of pieces in my King row columns and if it's an odd number I have the move.
|
| | Re: The Move Posted by ChipsChap on 21 May 2013 at 1:01PMRichard Pask prefers the more descriptive term "opposition." Having the move, of course, is an advantage, except when it isn't. It's a concept that is often described but seldom really explained, and can be very valuable and yet very misleading.
|
| | Re: The Move Posted by amthevessel on 21 May 2013 at 1:03PM...take three goblins and stir well...( Oldbury's Move Over page26 )
|
| | Re: The Move Posted by Robyn Hode on 21 May 2013 at 1:04PMGreat book!
|
| What's the Move? Posted by Robyn Hode on 20 May 2013 at 1:26PMThe position below is from the Cross Opening where Red has erred on his fourth move with 9-13? Here are the moves
11-15 23-18 8-11 27-23 4-8 23-19 9-13 and the game continued 26-23 6-9 (G-line attack) 30-26 9-14 18-9 5-14 32-27 1-5...
White to play. What is the move that sets up the winning shot?
|
| | Re: What's the Move? Posted by john39 on 20 May 2013 at 4:08PM19-16 12-19 23-16 11-20 22-17 11-20 22-17 13-22 25-4 white wins
|
| | Re: What's the Move? Posted by Robyn Hode on 20 May 2013 at 4:18PMExcellent John.
|
| For Beginners Posted by Robyn Hode on 18 May 2013 at 1:50PM
Take a look at the board, if you were White, which two pieces would you want to hold back in your King's Row and why?
|
| | Re: For Beginners Posted by Robyn Hode on 20 May 2013 at 1:11PMCheckers on 30 and 32. Red would need to form a bridge to get to the King Row.
|
| In-and-Out Shot Posted by Robyn Hode on 15 May 2013 at 6:58PMThis one is nice...
|
| | Re: In-and-Out Shot Posted by ChipsChap on 16 May 2013 at 12:25AMI was going to put the solution here but I won't spoil it, it's just too much fun. If you need a hint, a slip is combined with the in and out.
|
| | Re: In-and-Out Shot Posted by transfusion on 16 May 2013 at 11:18AMEasy one!
|
| | Re: In-and-Out Shot Posted by Robyn Hode on 18 May 2013 at 11:04AMFor novices and those not familiar with the numbered squares on a checkerboard:
White checkers on bottom with higher numbered squares. Double corner on right (28/32), single corner (29) on left.
The White to move and win diagram at the top of this thread involves three moves by White to win.
|
| | Re: In-and-Out Shot Posted by Robyn Hode on 20 May 2013 at 1:03PMThe shot begins with 14-9, forcing Red to play 5-14. White then gives up another checker with 21-17, forcing Red to play 14-21 and now White plays 30-26! Red must crown with 21-30 and now White crowns with 6-2! After Red is forced to play 30-23 White clears the board with 2-11-20-27-18-11-4.
|
| King Me Posted by Robyn Hode on 8 May 2013 at 10:37AM |
| | Re: King Me Posted by ChipsChap on 9 May 2013 at 8:37PMIt's already available on vudu.com and itunes, see my checker maven blurb for links (checkermaven.com).
Of course neither of those sources works with Linux so I haven't watched it yet  But the movie seems well regarded in the checker community.
|
| The Slip Stroke Posted by Robyn Hode on 7 May 2013 at 10:31AMFrom Millard Hopper's Win at Checkers.
For beginners. Top players will see this immediately.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by FuzzyDuck on 7 May 2013 at 12:02PMgood job robyn
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Lind on 7 May 2013 at 5:30PM27-23, lol.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Robyn Hode on 7 May 2013 at 6:25PMFor a player like Lind that diagram was simple.
Here's another.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Lind on 7 May 2013 at 7:03PMVery nice slip shot and a white win on the move. I will let other players see if they can spot it. These types of slip shot wins are essential to know and master.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Gamerazer on 7 May 2013 at 11:42PMthank you for the diagrams, Robyn Hode! Very interesting.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Lind on 8 May 2013 at 7:04AMYes, very well done. Many thanks for the diagrams and interesting play on them. I don't know how you post the diagrams like this. Well done indeed
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Gamerazer on 8 May 2013 at 7:53AMwell, I think the answer is here, mr Lindus Edwards. as It says first you have to have your photo uploaded on server. there are dozens of them on your choice. but The General principe is the same as photos posted, say, in the ACF forums.
http://goldtoken.com/games/wiki?wiki=Platinum%20photos
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Skywalker on 8 May 2013 at 7:56AM22-18, game over.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Gamerazer on 8 May 2013 at 8:03AMyes, it resembles the first diagram in shot.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Robyn Hode on 8 May 2013 at 9:44AM("Skywalker") is correct.  And yes, Gamerazer it is a similar shot.
The moves for begginer-intermediate:
White 22-18, 13-22 and now 15-10, 6-15, then 18-11, 8-15 and then 25-11 and White wins. Black piece on 4 is blocked by White piece on 11. Black must play 5-9, then 29-25, and whichever way Black moves, to 9-13 or 9-14, is blocked by White's 25-22.
Another one coming up...
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Robyn Hode on 8 May 2013 at 9:47AMHere's another slip shot. Two kings on the board and White a checker down:
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Robyn Hode on 8 May 2013 at 9:52AMEdit: two kings for Black and one king for white.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Skywalker on 8 May 2013 at 10:04AM19-15.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Gamerazer on 8 May 2013 at 10:05AM19-25 and red kings are yours with blocking of dead 5. multiple jump.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Gamerazer on 8 May 2013 at 10:06AMoops my mistake - 19-15
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Robyn Hode on 8 May 2013 at 10:07AMNo, neither.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Robyn Hode on 8 May 2013 at 10:11AMJoking. Yes, that is one solution.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Robyn Hode on 8 May 2013 at 10:12AMWhat's the other?
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Gamerazer on 8 May 2013 at 10:14AM19-15 10-19-26 then 27-24 then multiple jumps by white king with stopping on 14
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Gamerazer on 8 May 2013 at 10:18AMor you can start with 27-24 then 19-15 the result is the same.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Robyn Hode on 8 May 2013 at 10:19AMYou can also begin with 27-24, then 20-27, 19-15, 10-26 and then king multiple jumps (32-23-30-21-14) and dead man on 5.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Robyn Hode on 8 May 2013 at 10:19AMAye
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Robyn Hode on 8 May 2013 at 10:20AMPeople underestimate how beautiful a game this is.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Robyn Hode on 8 May 2013 at 10:23AMCheckers, not this game on the diagram.  My father was from Arkansas and taught me the game as a child. I enjoyed it, but never truly appreciated it till I became an adult.
|
| | Re: The Slip Stroke Posted by Gamerazer on 8 May 2013 at 10:22AMall these numbers look like some kind of secret code
|
| Club tournament Posted by T-Rex on 21 Apr 2013 at 5:55AMThere is a new club tourney open for sign-ups offering the games of Checkers, Locos Ochos and all their variants.
12 clubs are participating, including The For the Love of Draughts Club, The GoldToken Pool Checkers Club and The Tiger Checker Club.
You have to be a member of one or more of the 12 clubs to sign up.
Everyone is welcome.
|
| 1116 2419 811 new game. Posted by TinTin on 16 Apr 2013 at 2:04PM Alex's Sixth Book, page 119, at D.
1116 2419 811 2218 1620 1814 918 2314
1017 2114 1116 2623D Draw.
TinTin.
|
| Club tourney Posted by T-Rex on 8 Mar 2013 at 6:49PMThe For the Love of Draughts Club is holding a club tourney where African-American Straight Checkers is the game we shall be playing.
If anyone wishes to play and is not a member of the club, just click on the above link and click under «Invitations» on the right side of the screen to join.
Then sign up for the tourney.
|
| | Re: Club tourney Posted by T-Rex on 17 Mar 2013 at 7:53AMThe For the Love of Draughts Club has five people signed up for its African-American Straight Checkers club tournament, but there is room for more.
The more, the merrier.
Anyone who joins the club is free to participate in this tourney.
No invitation is necessary to join.
|
| | Re: Club tourney Posted by T-Rex on 17 Mar 2013 at 7:57AMBy the way, this is a wiki-free, automated tournament.
|
| Tournament Checkers Posted by T-Rex on 4 Feb 2013 at 2:53PMIs anyone interested in African-American Straight Checkers?
It is played exactly the same as the standard game of Checkers except for the flying (long-range) king.
The Feb 2013 — 3-week round robin — SLOWPOKE Tournament includes African-American Straight Checkers and needs three more people to sign up.
Your interest will be appreciated.
|
| | Re: Tournament Checkers Posted by T-Rex on 4 Feb 2013 at 4:41PMHey! We now have three signed up.
One more and the game will be a go. 
Many thanks to those who have just signed up.
|
| | Re: Tournament Checkers Posted by FuzzyDuck on 4 Feb 2013 at 5:44PMwhere do you sign up
|
| | Re: Tournament Checkers Posted by ChipsChap on 4 Feb 2013 at 8:06PMI signed up even though I am probably very bad at it. But I like the lazy time control
Does Pool Checkers have backwards jumps for single men?
|
| | Re: Tournament Checkers Posted by T-Rex on 5 Feb 2013 at 4:49AMPool Checkers has both the flying king and backward jumps for single men.
African-American Straight Checkers has the flying king, but single men can not jump backward.
It finds itself midway between English Draughts (our standard game of Checkers) and Pool Checkers.
It is a kind of compromise game.
It has some of the conservatism of English Draughts and some of the liveliness of Pool Checkers.
It is basically the same as Spanish Checkers except for being take-to-your-advantage.
By the way, thanks for signing up.
|
| | Re: Tournament Checkers Posted by T-Rex on 5 Feb 2013 at 4:52AMWe now have four players signed up, so the game is a go.
If anyone else wishes to sign up, the more the merrier.
|
| a new checkers player. Posted by Gamerazer on 12 Jan 2013 at 9:11AMif you want a real competition in checkers, you may invite annepeace to a game of checkers. A very good player.
|
| | Re: a new checkers player. Posted by Lind on 12 Jan 2013 at 11:04AMThanks Nazim. I will send an invite. Presently, however, I am way off form and might prove boring to any opponent.
|
| | Re: a new checkers player. Posted by Gamerazer on 12 Jan 2013 at 11:17AMthanks! well, I don't think your playing style is boring to anyone here. thanks again
|
| | Re: a new checkers player. Posted by Lind on 12 Jan 2013 at 11:38AMI have been told it puts players to zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz, lol.
|
| | Re: a new checkers player. Posted by Purple on 12 Jan 2013 at 12:50PMWhat it does is humble your opponenets. lol
|
| Last chance Posted by T-Rex on 8 Jan 2013 at 7:47PMLast chance to join our new, automated club tournament in The GoldToken Pool Checkers Club.
It will kick off in the wee hours of Thursday morning.
You need to join the club in order to sign up for the tourney.
Anyone may join.
No invitation is needed.
Good luck.
|
| Pool Checkers Posted by T-Rex on 2 Jan 2013 at 4:02PMThe GoldToken Pool Checkers Club is signing up players for an automated —no invitations, no wiki— club tournament.
It will be a round robin.
One must be a member of the club to participate.
Anyone may join the club.
|
| Private games. Posted by Gamerazer on 13 Dec 2012 at 9:38AMReally, what if someone doesn't want his/her regular games, or some of them, to be viewed by other players (except by GT Support)? Of course, Tournament games should be seen by everyone. I know some game-sites which regular games can be hidden from viewing by players. I think it's a good feature. they call them the private games.
|
| | Re: Private games. Posted by dama1 on 13 Dec 2012 at 10:25AMby regular games is private...
on less you clik to make all you can see it...
|
| | Re: Private games. Posted by Gamerazer on 14 Dec 2012 at 2:50AM |
| | Re: Private games. Posted by Badger on 14 Dec 2012 at 1:41PMdama1 is 100% correct about this; all games are private, unless you make them public during the game creation process. What "private" means is the chat is not seen by others.
|
| | Re: Private games. Posted by Gamerazer on 14 Dec 2012 at 11:23PMthat's right, Badger!  All chats are private unless you make them public during the invitation creation process. but what about the games themselves? I think that would be good to have them hidden too if desired.
|
| | Re: Private games. Posted by BrnIdGirl on 15 Dec 2012 at 10:01AM
I guess I'm  as to why you would want to hide your games
|
| | Re: Private games. Posted by ChipsChap on 15 Dec 2012 at 5:05PMBecause my play is so bad
|
| | Re: Private games. Posted by Badger on 15 Dec 2012 at 7:19PMI am unaware of any game sites allowing the hiding of games, but regardless, there's good reason to leave them visible. Among the many reasons: players love to study games, see how you play, what techniques are used, and to see how far ahead good players look or calculate. Studying tactics will improve anyone's game a whole lot faster than rote memorization of boatloads of opening variations. In fact, studying and practicing tactics will improve your game a whole lot quicker than any other kind of game study (although studying endgames runs a really close second). If you learn to recognize tactical opportunities as they present themselves, you're going to start racking up more wins. The next step, of course, is learning how to create those opportunities, but neither of these happy circumstances will occur if you don't even begin a program of tactical study of your own and other players games.
|
| | Re: Private games. Posted by ChipsChap on 15 Dec 2012 at 9:50PMThe main competitor site allows hiding non-tournament games. All kidding aside I'm not sure what I think about that. Some checker players say that they don't want their "cooks" to be "stolen" but it seems like once you've played a certain line, it's out there anyhow ... at least nowadays. Perhaps 150 years ago it mattered...
|
| | Re: Private games. Posted by Gamerazer on 20 Dec 2012 at 12:01AMwooow, sorry, I didn't check this thread for several days. It seems that I accidentally unchecked "unsubscribe" box above.
well, what can I say? The fact that the main competitor site to which Chips Chaps refers (I suppose it's itsyourturn.com) allows hiding non-tournament games tells us They must have some reasons for having that option for those who wish to hide their non-tournament games. I think it's because unfortunately, not all players are honest, and showing a good sportsmanship in games i.e not all players use other games for learning tactical moments and for self-improving by this way about which Badger mentioned above. Not to mention some players deliberately time out if they see they lose games or some strong players just give up a man to a weak player to capture so that to show their "supremacy". well, it's method of harassment. One of the ways of preventing it is to have that option. well, at least for some emergency cases.
|
| |